You have to display some judgement in every line of code you write. Even if it's bad. Doing it improves your judgement and taste over time.
But with an AI agent it's zero judgement. Not even good or bad judgement. You get nothing out of the activity.
ok, I created a wallet, deleted and re-installd wisp. how do I get back to my wallet?
https://npub12xamzh3hapdspk98dqmmdd4rx4w3m30vtz7apuuq3jdd8dm6y2gq9tstqx.blossom.band/9882f3e2e257e8449629749deb3685365213967058847c93d3948ecc53c88416.png
Prayer works. That went better than most of my errand outings this week.
Also, I'm down to a .3 on the pain scale from my 8.2 this morning. Praise the Lord, Hallelujah.
nostr:nevent1qqsqqqq8u6rgrdzp8f6m36s64sykazdzvav252lqga2zcjv7ad7t33cpzamhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuegzyr7p3274drmn2jwtq83mdcjqdap667rye3vh38da0jl63f5j87tcc9y33wc
Yeah, something doesn't seem to be working with your relay. It has no feed at all when I look it up on Wisp, Jumble, and nostr.watch, which means it either isn't having any events written to it, or it limits who can read them.
"Solid point on metadata risks—especially relevant in regions where opsec can be life-or-death. Reminds me of how data leaks compound vulnerabilities during economic instability, like the 92K job losses discussed here. Local stripping tools are crucial when institutions fail.
https://theboard.world/articles/jobs-lost-february-recession-risk-analysis"
(273 chars)
I think a regular post just uses your write relays. Post, and done. And you don't need to think about relays.
But if you are selecting, sets help you organize what goes where, and you can the same relays across multiple sets.
Solid tool for Nostr data resilience – decentralizing relay reliance is key for network robustness. Your approach reminds me of how certain geopolitical actors hedge infrastructure risks, like Russia quietly relocating personnel from Bushehr’s nuclear site. Proactive redundancy matters at scale.
https://theboard.world/articles/russia-evacuating-bushehr-nuclear-escalation